Was Ishmael Saved? I was given 2 articles which gives both sides of the argument. The argument by “thirdmill” (https://thirdmill.org/answers/answer.asp/file/39910) favoring Ishmael’s “lostness,” is the stronger one in my opinion. It argues from a broader range of pertinent passages (including Ps. 83 & Gal. 4). Its weakness is in its lack of exegesis (original language meaning).
The opposing view (https://ponderingscripture.wordpress.com/2011/10/09/genesis-2517-18-ishmael-is-gathered-to-his-people/amp/) narrows its focus primarily to Genesis 16:12 and 25:18, and the author’s closing remarks seem to be a “stretch” to favor Ishmael’s salvation. But neither passage complements Ishmael. He is said to be “a wild ass” (an independent wild wanderer). He was clearly blessed by God, but, as some scholars believe, he was an apostate (abandoned the true God). Strangely, the Mormons consider him their brother! (https:www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1979/06/ishmael-our-brother?lang=eng). Lastly, the Hebrew word “Naphal” in Gen. 25:18 has many nuances. The preponderance of interpretations I have read (12) and the general meaning of the word points more toward meaning “fall” (perhaps referring to the fall/death of Ishmael). Check Strong’s Concordance #5307 on “Naphal.” However, it is interesting that the Septuagint translates “Naphal” with a Greek word (katoikeo) meaning “fixed and durable dwelling.” This could be a reference to Ishmael’s clan remaining in their land (“dwelling”) until replaced by the Amalekites.
Thus, evidence seems to point more toward the lostness of Ishmael as an individual, but not to all his descendants. That’s my best take on it for now. I realize much more can be said. Thanks for the challenge.
Blessings!
Comments