First, while "once saved, always saved" is not mentioned in Scripture, "eternal life" is mentioned (John 3:16). Since salvation is eternal (Heb. 5:9), then "once saved, always saved" is true. Otherwise, “eternal” is meaningless. To deny eternal security is opting for false doctrine.
Second, my understanding of Heb. 6 is that it is hypothetical. Verse 3 is often overlooked. It says, “if God permits." To me, that clause makes it hypocritical. The readers of Hebrews thought they would lose their salvation if they did what verses 1 & 2 say. They would be unsaved, "if God permits," but He won't (Jude 24). If God did permit the loss of their salvation, it would be impossible "to renew them again unto repentance" (Heb. 6:4-6). That's my best understanding of that passage.
Third, the passage in Revelation 3:5 is not a threat but a promise. Jesus said, "I will not blot out his name out of the Book of Life." Why? Because salvation is eternal. Those names written in the book were "chosen...before the foundation of the world" (Eph. 1:4).
Fourth, after Jesus rose from the dead, He commissioned Peter, who had denied Christ, to care for His flock (John 21:15-17). Peter preached the first Christian message on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14-36) and wrote 1st and 2nd Peter. Does that sound like someone who lost his salvation?
Finally, the answer to your last question is this: a professing believer who denies Christ is most likely unsaved (1 John 2:18-19). A professing believer who is genuinely saved and denies Christ is like Peter was, still saved but backslidden. His denial reflects his unfaithfulness, but it doesn't cause God's faithfulness to cease (2 Tim. 2:13).
I believe God would rather a saint in denial die physically than lose his salvation (1 John 5:16-17).
Blessings!
ความคิดเห็น